I received positive and helpful feedback from my peers, to make sure to project my voice and use hand motions to make it seem like I’m moving. I expected more negative feedback. I thought there would be feedback on how short my video was and how fast I talked. I changed my presentation by being longer, using more hand motions, and made my video longer with more important points.
Friday, July 10, 2020
Elevator pitch no. 2
https://youtu.be/rpDDZ3X7YOs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey Lauren!! The difference between your first and second elevator pitch is huge. You did a great job incorporating the feedback you received from the first elevator pitch assignment into the second one. I know I had a hard time hearing you in the first one, but had no problem hearing and understanding you in this one. Keep up the great work!
ReplyDeleteHi Lauren!
ReplyDeleteAlthough I did not see you first video, based on the summary of feedback you received, it is evident that you have worked to deliver your presentation in a thorough cohesive way. I would suggest that the introduction could be removed, per Dr. Pryor's lecture. He has said that it can waste valuable time and attention of your listeners. I would have loved to know a bit more about the distribution process for your app's content, ie. through quizzes, lecture style delivery etc. This would have helped to explain the feasibility a bit better as well. Overall, great work!
Hi Lauren!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed watching your elevator pitch. I definitely noticed the hand gestures that you implemented, which made the presentation more interactive. While I understand that you were wanting to slow down your pace, I felt as if there were times were a slightly faster tempo would have been more engaging and allow for greater fluidity. Lastly, I would love to hear more details about the app (it seemed a bit too vague)---what type of games, content, or designs would be entailed within the app?